Category Archives: Philosophy

 

The most interesting questions are always the ones parallel to the ones we are asking ourselves. I felt on one about a perfect world.

Most of us might see a perfect world as a result instead of a process – how a world in process could be perfect? I couldn’t stand an unimprovable world.

But the most important question about a perfect world is not how it would be but how we are. A perfect world would be built from who we are.

Would a perfect world be suitable with us?

Mostly: what are we made of? Greed? Fear? Hunger?

Before willing to improve the world, shouldn’t we be willing to improve ourselves?

Lately, old teenage ideas about a better world came back in my mind. I thought: what’s missing? Why are we thinking about a better world? Do we miss ingredients? Recipes? Cooks?

It’s easy to imagine a better world. Damn easy. But according to who we are, could we get better?

If determinism is true, does this undermine morality? Would Hitler be morally equal to Gandhi because both are pre-determined to act the way they did? Should this affect the anger we feel towards ‘immoral’ people?

From Askphilosophers.org 

Yesterday, I fell on the end of the classic movie “It’s a wonderful life”.

  • Did I improve the world in any way so far?
  • How many people can say so, that the world would be worse without them?
  • Is it on TV at this time of the year as some kind of anti-suicide propaganda?

Is happiness in our hands or our eyes?

A few years ago, I thought if I had to pick between blindness or deafness, I’d give away my ears. Now, that’s my eyes I’d sacrifice first…

 

These days, I’m thinking a lot about (un)happiness and what I (dis)like about my life. Yesterday, as I were watching a few episodes of a 24 DVD, I received a piece of advice of a dying character.

Believe it or not, I used to want to be a teacher. A long time ago. You know why I didn’t? DoD offered me more money. That’s how I made my decision. So I made myself miserable. And I made everybody else around me miserable. For an extra five thousand dollars a year. That was my price. You know, Michelle, I’m not a big advice giver, but under the circumstances… Don’t wait around for your life to happen to you. Find something that makes you happy, and do it. Because everything else is all just background noise.

Honesty, that’s probably the healthiest thing I can receive.

I think I’m facing an identity crisis. Since I moved out, since my own roots moved, I’m into the same questions Tony Soprano asked as he woke up after his coma:

Who am I? Where am I going?

I’d like to find answers but I’m not sure I found the proper questions yet. Well, if anyone has some book suggestions that could be useful, be my guest.

Last fall and winter I thought a lot about the purpose of my life. I still might be looking for answers but I’m good with what I already have.

But these days, I’m facing thoughts about my identity.

There is a close relationship between who we are and what we do. But I don’t know which has the biggest influence on the other.

After asking myself what I need to do, it seems I need to think about who I need to be.

These questions are always tricked. We can pretend we have the freedom to answer anything but one man can’t build his own world. We only can work for the best.

X hours being a worker + X hours being a sleeper + X hours being an eater + X hours being a lover + X hours being a TV watcher + X hours being a public transit user…

Does time remain to be myself? And what does being myself mean?

 

I’m thinking a lot about echoes these days. On how strong events on other people lives talk to my own life. Young woman dying too young from a cancer, nice and gentle people fired all around, great woman and mother living with some mean and angry husband… Lives telling me I should do more, do better with my own.

Is lottery impious? Not itself, but at a second level. Buying a lottery ticket means we would like to drastically improve the life God gave us. I don’t consider that wishing a drastic improvement of our life is impious but trying to get that change with a lottery ticket may be. Shouldn’t we work to get a better life if we want to change it? I don’t know, I see lottery as ungrateful… Many dreams can’t come true only with hard work: winning the lottery would make them possible. I don’t know…

Were there a people of gods, their government would be democratic. So perfect a government is not for men.

Rousseau, The Social Contract

First haiku: sometimes I wonder if I don’t have more empathy for trees than for people. Odd for a poet – a tree killer.

Second haiku: adbuster moment of the day.

Third haiku: nothing to say.

Fourth haiku: disemboweled was almost the last word I read from that Darwin awards book. It looked like it was used in some kind of sport commentating description in a fight between two men and a tiger. The word kept going in my head until I used it in a poem. The other part (all the following words) speaks about Friday noon when the wonderful weather made the streets and parks full of people downtown.

Proceed: I was looking at a paperclip thinking I don’t really know how it’s made (kind of, but not completely). We are surrounded by processed things we don’t know how they are made. Altering our whole relationship with the world and choices we would make.

First untitled poem: same theme as used in several poems lately. This intersection concept illustrates very well how I feel. When you are at an intersection, you’re both somewhere very specific and nowhere because an intersection is only a relationship. It’s like love. Love exists because of two people and don’t exist itself . So I exist and don’t exist.

Second untitled poem: I felt very bad last night. Headache, nauseous, sneezing (ok, sneezing is not feeling bad), extremely tired. But I was too tired and my head hurt too much to sleep. Then sleep eventually occurred and now I’m a new man. I thought of the first verse last night, thinking I could also write a poem in French (Caresser mon cadavre tiède, it may sound better than the English verse (back to some intersection issue)). I wrote the rest this morning.

Freedom carol: I thought of the last line yesterday but I was too effing tired to build the rest. Maybe the most philosophical poem I wrote this spring. But certainly the first prose poem I wrote this spring. I first thought I could build verses of random length but it was pointless. Like 23, I may change the order eventually.

(via Sulz)

  1. Those who try to dominate me. Include control freaks.
  2. Narrow minds. No, buddy, your way is not the only possible way.
  3. Those who don’t care to ruin other lives with their stupidity.
  4. Cowards.
  5. Those who step repeatedly on a paradox without care, like a minister of environment talking and acting against environment. Even if we can say the minister of transport can’t give Quebec decent roads and public transit system, the minister of health decent health care system, the minister of education decently educated population… But at least they manage to look like they try.
  6. Sadists. Or even a lack of empathy.
  7. Those who don’t care about knowing someone before judging.
  8. Those who try to hide they don’t like me.
  9. Those who don’t give a first chance.
  10. Monologuists. Communication shouldn’t be a fight.

I think we can sum up saying people lying to themselves make me angry, mostly when these lies hurt me and my will to have a nice day. Still, I try hard to not get angry about fear and ignorance. And give people a chance to face their inner truth.

Also, when I look at the list, I’m not surprised I don’t vote anymore…

 

Can’t wait to see the new Spiderman. Well, I can but… I really think the Spiderman franchise is the best movie adaptation of a Superhero. We can see the soul of Spiderman/Peter Parker. We can make links with our lives (well, I do). At the opposite, Superman. Nice, classic superhero (my favorite when I was 3) but we feel so far from him. No wonder the latest adaptation wasn’t a big success. Even the Christopher Reeves ones, we can’t much say “oh yeah, I know what it’s like”. We see a dude flying and fighting a bald man (when the bad guy is the main interest of a superhero movie it’s not a good sign). Could they make a Superman movie closer from us ? I don’t know if I could find a way myself (still, interesting challenge).

At least, if you can’t make it close, make it wild, like the X-Men. They tried hard to put personnal issues in the franchise but the main interest is the wildness of these characters. Wolverine mostly. I don’t think you can’t put much wildness in Superman.

Hulk and Batman are a bit of a mix of closeness and wildness.

Superman is really something else. Maybe we still like him because he’s the father of all modern superheroes ?

There is about meanness four types of people:

  • The mean being mean: quite common, sadly, and we try to avoid them.
  • The mean being gentle: in other words, a hypocrite. Can be easily confused with the next one.
  • The gentle being gentle: there could be more of them.
  • The gentle being mean: very rare. And hated by most, and mostly by the mean ones being mean. Maybe because they know more than others that these rare archetypes are mean to push us to the best of us. True pedagogues are rare. And rarely understood. Sadly.

I’m wondering however which of the three others is the most common… I know which would be preferable but…